Explore the controversy of AI art, understand artists’ resistance, and legal issues, and discover controversial AI artworks.
|
Legal Considerations for AI Art
AI-generated art poses unique challenges to existing legal frameworks, particularly in relation to copyright infringement, ownership of AI-generated works, and unlicensed content in training data. The law is unclear on who owns the rights to AI-generated art, whether it is the human programmer, the AI itself, or the public domain. Let's know what are some main legal considerations for AI art.
|
|
Photo by Sora Shimazaki |
1. Copyright Challenges in AI Art
AI-generated art has introduced a new dimension to copyright laws. Traditionally, copyright laws have been designed to protect the rights of human creators. However, with AI now capable of creating art, it raises the question of whether these works should be protected under copyright laws. This is particularly challenging because AI does not have legal personality and cannot own copyrights. Furthermore, AI can generate art by learning from a vast amount of data, which may include copyrighted works. This raises concerns about potential copyright infringement.
2. Ownership of AI Art: An Unresolved Issue:
The question of who owns the rights to AI-generated art is complex. If we consider the human programmers who designed the AI, it could be argued that they indirectly contributed to the creation of the art. However, if we consider the AI itself, it’s the one that directly created the art. But can AI own copyrights? Currently, the law does not provide a clear answer. Another possibility is that AI-generated art belongs to the public domain, free for everyone to use.
3. U.S. Federal Ruling: A Landmark Decision
In 2023, a U.S. federal judge made a significant ruling regarding AI and copyright. The judge ruled that AI-created artwork does not meet the criteria for federal copyright protection because copyright law is confined to the “original intellectual conceptions of the author.” This implies that AI, as a non-human entity, cannot be recognized as an ‘author’ under current copyright law.
4. Legal Implications of Generative AI: Still Unclear
Despite the 2023 ruling, the legal landscape surrounding the use of generative AI is still evolving. Companies that use AI tools could potentially face legal risks if they unknowingly incorporate copyrighted content generated by these tools into their products. This risk is further heightened by the fact that some AI tools are capable of generating content that closely resembles existing copyrighted works.
5. Ethical Considerations: A New Frontier
Beyond the legal implications, AI art also raises several ethical issues. For instance, there are concerns that AI could displace human artists or blur the lines between human-created and AI-created art. There’s also the risk of AI-generated art forgeries. Furthermore, AI’s potential bias and lack of transparency could impact its creativity, leading to debates on the authorship and ownership of AI-generated art.
Why Do Artists Hate AI Art?
Many artists believe that AI disrupts traditional art forms and practices. There’s also the concern about copyright infringement, and some even perceive this kind of art as a devaluation of human talent.
|
|
Photo by Luis Quintero |
1. The Human Element in Art
Many artists perceive AI-generated art as lacking the depth, complexity, and storytelling that are inherent in human creativity. They argue that true artistic expression requires a level of creativity and emotion that machines cannot replicate. Art is not just about the final product; it’s about the journey of exploration, the process of trial and error, and the personal growth that comes from creating something unique.
2. The Threat to Authenticity
The skepticism and resistance towards AI art stem from artists’ desire to protect and preserve the integrity, authenticity, and creative spirit that make art a profoundly human endeavor. Artists pride themselves on their ability to express themselves, tap into emotions, and create unique and personal works of art. They worry that the ease with which AI-generated art can be created and shared may lead to an oversaturation of mediocre artwork, making it harder for skilled artists to stand out and make a living.
3. Disruption of Traditional Art Forms
AI has the potential to severely disrupt conventional art forms and practices. Some artists and professionals view it as a threat to their craft. They see AI as a shortcut that bypasses the years of practice, study, and experience that traditionally go into mastering an art form.
4. The Ethical Dilemma
Beyond the legal implications, AI art also raises several ethical issues. For instance, there are concerns that AI could displace human artists or blur the lines between human-created and AI-created art. There’s also the risk of AI-generated art forgeries. Furthermore, AI’s potential bias and lack of transparency could impact its creativity, leading to debates on the authorship and ownership of AI-generated art.
Controversial AI Artworks
There are several controversial AI artworks that have gained popularity in recent times. Let's know some of them and why they became controversial.
1. Théâtre D’opéra Spatial
|
|
Théâtre D’opéra Spatial Image Jason M. Allen |
In 2022, Jason M. Allen created a piece called “Théâtre D’opéra Spatial,” or Space Opera Theater, using the Midjourney AI art generator. This artwork, depicting a futuristic royal scene, won the top prize in the “Digital Arts/Digitally Manipulated Photography” category at the 2022 Colorado State Fair. This achievement marked one of the first times an AI-generated image had won such a prize. However, this victory led to a backlash from artists who accused Allen of cheating. Despite the controversy, Allen insisted he would continue to try to gain copyright registration for his work.
2. Portrait of Edmond Belamy
|
Another artwork that sparked controversy is “Portrait of Edmond Belamy.” This AI-generated piece of art was created by a Paris-based art collective called Obvious. They used a type of artificial intelligence algorithm called generative adversarial networks to create the artwork. The image became a news story when it was sold at auction for a staggering $432,000 in 2018. This event marked a significant moment in the history of AI art, but it also raised questions about the definition of art and the role of the artist. The piece has been criticized because it was created using a generative adversarial network (GAN) software package based on prior research by others and implemented by Robbie Barrat, an AI artist who was not affiliated with Obvious, leading to allegations that Obvious contributed minimally to the final work product.
3. The Next Rembrandt
|
|
The Next Rembrandt, Image by Dutch Digital Design |
“The Next Rembrandt” is another controversial AI artwork that was created using data from Rembrandt’s complete body of work. The project, a collaboration between ING Bank, Microsoft, and several Dutch museums, used deep learning algorithms and facial recognition techniques to create a new artwork in the style of the Dutch master. However, the project drew criticism from some quarters, with critics arguing that it reduced Rembrandt’s art to a mere set of stylistic quirks.
4. AICAN’s Artworks
|
AICAN, an AI artist developed by researchers at Rutgers University, has also created controversial artworks. In 2017, AICAN’s artworks were exhibited at the Art Basel show in Miami, marking one of the first times that AI-generated art had been exhibited at a major art fair. However, the exhibition sparked debate about the nature of creativity and the role of AI in art.
Conclusion
"The advent of AI in the art world has undoubtedly stirred controversy and sparked important discussions about creativity, originality, and the value of human talent. As AI continues to evolve, so too will the discourse surrounding its role in art."
👉Enjoyed the article? Support my work by purchasing a
FAQs
1. Is AI Art copyrightable?
In the United States, AI-generated art is legal, but it is crucial to avoid infringing on a living artist’s style or work.
2. Can You monetize AI art without breaking the law?
In most jurisdictions, using AI art for both personal and commercial purposes is deemed legal, provided that the work does not directly infringe on another individual’s creation.
3. What are the legal implications of generative AI?
The legal implications of using generative AI are still unclear, particularly in relation to copyright infringement, ownership of AI-generated works, and unlicensed content in training data.
4. Why is AI art so dangerous?
On the content side of AI art, the images can be offensive or harmful, and this danger is further exacerbated by the potential for AI deepfake videos.
5. What are some controversial AI artworks?
Some controversial AI artworks include “Théâtre D’opéra Spatial,” by Jason M. Allen and “Portrait of Edmond Belamy” which was sold at auction for $432,000 in 2018.
0 Comentarios